Rapid Fire Australian Epidemiology Association ASM 2018

Improving REporting of DAta from Registries (IREDAR) Guidelines (#125)

Arul Earnest 1 , Susannah Ahern 1 , Ingrid Hopper 1 , Fanny Sampurno 1 , Breanna Pellegrini 1 , Husna Begum 1 , Swarna Vishwanath 1
  1. Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

Background

Various checklists exist to improve the quality of data reporting in the healthcare field by identifying and standardising key items so the quality of studies can be easily appraised. No such guidelines exist for clinical quality registries.

Aim

To develop a checklist for registries covering a variety of medical conditions and devices.

Methods

We reviewed existing reporting guidelines to develop items encompassing key elements of a registry report including design, methods and data analysis. Consensus on the final checklist of items to be included for analysis and reporting in registries was obtained using a modified Delphi process, which includes online survey and teleconference. Participants were a multidisciplinary panel comprising 13 clinical leads of registries and statisticians. All the items identified from the review were included in an online survey, which is underway, and rated on their relative importance. Consensus for an item to be included in the final checklist was achieved using the Interpercentile Range Adjusted for Symmetry (IPRAS) measure.

Results

The review of existing reporting guidelines resulted in 23 items. This IREDAR checklist includes 1 item for the ‘Title and Summary’ section, 2 items under ‘Introduction’, 13 items under ‘Methods’, 4 items under ‘Results’, 2 items under ‘Discussion’ and 1 item under ‘Other Information’. We will present each item in detail, with descriptions and clinical examples. The results of the Delphi process will be presented.

Conclusion

The publication of this checklist for reporting of registry data will improve the quality and reliability of reports generated from registries.